Recent Posts

XL1509-EN vs LM2596 vs MP2307

DC-DC Buck Converter Comparison Chart

These three ICs are among the most commonly used step-down (buck) converters in DIY, embedded, and industrial electronics. While they serve similar purposes, they differ significantly in efficiency, size, frequency, and application focus.


Feature & Specification Comparison

Parameter

XL1509-EN

LM2596

MP2307

Manufacturer

XLSEMI

Texas Instruments

Monolithic Power Systems

Regulator Type

Buck (Step-Down)

Buck (Step-Down)

Buck (Step-Down)

Topology

Non-synchronous

Non-synchronous

Synchronous

Input Voltage Range

~4.5 V – 40 V

4.5 V – 40 V

4.75 V – 23 V

Output Voltage

Adjustable (≈1.25–36 V)

Adjustable (≈1.23–37 V)

Adjustable (≈0.925–20 V)

Max Output Current

~3 A

3 A

3 A

Switching Frequency

~150 kHz

150 kHz

340 kHz

Efficiency (Typical)

85–90%

80–90%

90–95%

External Diode Required

Yes

Yes

No (synchronous)

Quiescent Current

Moderate

High

Low

Package / Module Size

Medium

Large

Very compact

Heat Generation

Moderate

Higher

Lower

Cost

Low

Low–Medium

Medium–High

Design Complexity

Easy

Easy

Moderate

Typical Modules

Widely available

Very common

Compact high-density boards


⚙️ Architecture Differences Explained

XL1509-EN & LM2596 (Non-Synchronous Buck)

  • Use an external Schottky diode
  • Simpler design and cheaper
  • Slightly lower efficiency
  • Larger inductor and capacitor size

MP2307 (Synchronous Buck)

  • Uses internal MOSFETs instead of diode
  • Much higher efficiency
  • Less heat at high currents
  • Smaller PCB footprint
  • Better for battery-powered devices

Application-Based Comparison

Application

Recommended IC

Reason

DIY projects

XL1509-EN

Cheap, robust, easy to use

Bench power supply

LM2596

Proven, widely supported

Battery-powered devices

MP2307

High efficiency, low loss

Space-constrained designs

MP2307

Compact footprint

High input voltage (24–36 V)

LM2596 / XL1509-EN

Higher Vin tolerance

Industrial electronics

LM2596 / XL1509-EN

Rugged, tolerant

IoT & portable devices

MP2307

Low quiescent current


Thermal & Efficiency Comparison

  • LM2596 → Highest heat generation at high load
  • XL1509-EN → Slightly better thermal performance than LM2596
  • MP2307 → Coolest operation due to synchronous design

Which One Should You Choose?

✅ Choose XL1509-EN if:

  • You want a low-cost alternative to LM2596
  • Input voltage can go up to 36–40 V
  • Efficiency is important but not critical

✅ Choose LM2596 if:

  • You want a proven, industry-standard solution
  • You need wide input voltage support
  • PCB space is not a concern

✅ Choose MP2307 if:

  • Your design is battery-powered
  • You need high efficiency and low heat
  • Compact size is critical

Final Verdict

Priority

Best Choice

Cost & simplicity

XL1509-EN

Proven reliability

LM2596

Efficiency & compact size

MP2307

All three converters are reliable, but the right choice depends on efficiency requirements, board space, input voltage range, and thermal constraints.

No comments